<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charity gets a bum rap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pdf23ds.net/2006/08/04/charity-gets-a-bum-rap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pdf23ds.net/2006/08/04/charity-gets-a-bum-rap/</link>
	<description>I will not be swayed be every small current; nor will the memes faze me or infect me. I am pure. I am intelligent. I am rational. I am at peace.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: pdf23ds</title>
		<link>http://pdf23ds.net/2006/08/04/charity-gets-a-bum-rap/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>pdf23ds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pdf23ds.net/?p=90#comment-229</guid>
		<description>Amen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LizardBreath</title>
		<link>http://pdf23ds.net/2006/08/04/charity-gets-a-bum-rap/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>LizardBreath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pdf23ds.net/?p=90#comment-228</guid>
		<description>This is just dumping irritation at an argumentative tactic somewhere that it won't be seen as accusing anyone specific, which I don't mean to.

Can we make a rule that no one, ever again, may claim that "you're mischaracterizing my argument" or "that's a strawman" without immediately going on to clearly explain what makes the attacked argument inaccurate, and what the speaker actually is arguing?  I hate that shit.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just dumping irritation at an argumentative tactic somewhere that it won&#8217;t be seen as accusing anyone specific, which I don&#8217;t mean to.</p>
<p>Can we make a rule that no one, ever again, may claim that &#8220;you&#8217;re mischaracterizing my argument&#8221; or &#8220;that&#8217;s a strawman&#8221; without immediately going on to clearly explain what makes the attacked argument inaccurate, and what the speaker actually is arguing?  I hate that shit.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
